Family
Health Care Decisions Act (FHCDA)
Memo
Sponsors: Senators Seward, Hannon / Assemblymember Gottfried
Bill
# S.5807/ # A.5406A
The New York State Right to Life Committee
opposes the Family Health Care
Decisions Act (FHCDA), unless our critical amendments are incorporated into
the bill to prevent hospitals from denying life-saving treatment against
the will of patients and their families.
Increasingly, the “quality of life” ethic has become a
justification for health care facilities’ withdrawing or denying treatment, or
even food and water, regardless of the wishes of patients or families.
This new ethic is permeating the health care community and our culture.
Health care providers and hospitals have in many cases adopted so-called
“futility policies.” “Futility”
used to mean the treatment would not work to save the patient’s life (medical
or “physiological” futility). Now
“futility” often means the treatment would work, but in the provider’s
view the patient is “better off” dead so the treatment is therefore bad or
“qualitatively“ futile.
For
over a decade, the New York State legislature has been considering proposals to
enact a Family Health Care Decisions Act. Throughout
that period, New York State Right to Life has steadfastly fought to amend these
bills to protect patients and families who want treatment.
Our efforts have been successful in stopping this legislation from
becoming law without our protective amendments.
Specifically, when a health care facility wants involuntarily to withhold
treatment, food, or fluids whose denial, in reasonable medical judgment, would
result in the patient’s death, our amendments would allow the patient’s
transfer to another health care provider willing to respect the patient/family
choice for life. Most critically,
these amendments would require such treatment, food, and fluids to be provided
until the transfer is completed.
Finally,
there are indications that those promoting the Family Health Care Decisions Act
may be willing to incorporate such amendments.
It is crucial to keep the pressure on state legislators, especially
senators, to oppose the Family Health Care Decisions Act unless these amendments
are in fact made.
Please
tell your state legislators that respect for patient autonomy means equal
respect when the choice of a patient or a duly designated surrogate is for life.
Ask for their commitment to oppose the Family Health Care Decisions Act
until assured by the New York State Right to Life Committee that acceptable
amendments have been included to protect against involuntary
euthanasia.
Note: Please ask
your legislator to contact our office for the specific amendment language.
June 2006